Skip to content
nota cutisClear notes. Better questions.

Hair research / 2018

Hair growth over 24 weeks: a split-scalp study explained

One side of the scalp received light and the other sham treatment. Here is what changed and why the comparison matters.

How it worked

One hundred people with pattern hair loss took part. Each person received real light on one side of the scalp and sham light on the other. Treatment lasted thirty minutes, three times weekly, for twenty-four weeks.

Why use two sides?

Comparing two sides of the same person helps reduce differences between participants. Researchers used scalp photographs, hair measurements and ratings to assess change.

What changed

At twenty-four weeks, the reported hair-coverage figures were 14.2% on the treated side and 11.8% on the sham side. Other hair measures also favoured treatment at the twelve- and twenty-four-week checks. No serious adverse events were observed.

What to remember

Both sides showed change, so the comparison matters more than a before-and-after photo alone. This study tests one treatment setup; it does not provide a universal schedule for every cap.

Read the paper

Fan SMY et al. Dermatologic Surgery. 2018;44(11):1411–1420.

Efficacy and Safety of a Low-Level Light Therapy for Androgenetic Alopecia: A 24-Week Trial

PMID 29957664 · DOI 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001577

This note explains the published abstract. It is not a review of the full paper or personal medical advice. Published 1 November 2026.