Skip to content
nota cutisClear notes. Better questions.

ISDIN
vs SkinCeuticals

Two formulas, with different prices and ingredient blends.

Hyaluronic Concentrate compared with H.A. Intensifier Multi-Glycan
What to compareISDIN Hyaluronic ConcentrateSkinCeuticals H.A. Intensifier Multi-Glycan
US reference price$115 / 30 mL · $3.83/mL$120 / 30 mL · $4.00/mL
HA formsLow- and medium-molecular-weight HA, according to brandBrand states 1.3% hyaluronic acid
Disclosed concentrationsNot disclosed1.3% HA; 12% Proxylane; 2% ferment, brand figures
Other ingredients to considerBioMarine extract, peptides, lentil extractProxylane, soybean ferment, licorice and purple rice extracts
FormatWater-gel; pump; satin finishGel-serum; dropper
Evidence statusBrand user-perception claims plus ingredient-level HA evidence.Manufacturer formula claims; generic HA studies cannot validate every claim.

The practical difference

ISDIN: The water-gel format and pump may appeal if you want a lightweight step under moisturiser.

SkinCeuticals: The clearest headline concentration disclosure in this selection, useful if you want to know the stated HA percentage.

What the comparison cannot tell you

ISDIN: The brand’s reported user-perception results are data on file, not a published head-to-head trial. Molecular weights in kDa are not supplied on the checked page.

SkinCeuticals: A larger stated percentage is not proof of stronger results. Claims about skin HA levels and facial volume remain manufacturer claims, not a comparison with these four alternatives.

These published details do not establish a clinical winner. No head-to-head study of this pair was identified in this review. Prices were checked 2 November 2026; confirm current local prices.

Read the ingredient evidence