Skip to content
nota cutisClear notes. Better questions.

Omnilux Contour vs Shark CryoGlow

Omnilux Contour Face and Shark CryoGlow FW312, side by side. They share 830 nm; Omnilux Contour lists 132 LEDs and Shark CryoGlow lists 480 LEDs in 160 tri-wick packages. What the brand lists only; neither is ranked.

Checked · Alphabetical order

What is different

Shared wavelengths
830 nm
Only Omnilux Contour
633 nm
Only Shark CryoGlow
415, 630 nm
LED count
132 vs 480 LEDs in 160 tri-wick packages
Session
10 min vs 6.4 min ageing · 8.4 min clearing · 4.3 min maintenance
Near-infrared
Both list near-infrared

Why it matters

Both list red and near-infrared light, the pairing used in several wrinkle studies.

Only the Shark CryoGlow lists blue light, which acne studies paired with red.

Sessions differ: 10 min versus 6.4 min ageing · 8.4 min clearing · 4.3 min maintenance. Session time alone does not set the dose; output matters too.

Studies matching only the Shark CryoGlow

Six studies match both, including why the amount of light matters.

Omnilux Contour vs Shark CryoGlow: published specifications side by side
SpecificationOmnilux Contour Face — LED face maskOmniluxContour FaceShark CryoGlow FW312 — LED face maskSharkCryoGlow FW312
Wavelengths633 · 830 nm415 · 630 · 830 nm
LED count132480 LEDs in 160 tri-wick packages
Reported irradiance≈30 mW/cm²Not found on checked page
Session10 min6.4 min ageing · 8.4 min clearing · 4.3 min maintenance
FitFlexible siliconeRigid shell · under-eye cooling
Power & controlsRechargeable controllerRechargeable; check regional manual
Regulatory claimFDA cleared for full-face wrinkles, manufacturer claim; CE · TGA as reported by LED Mask SpecsFDA cleared CryoGlow FW3XXXX family; other regional markings not reverified
Reference priceUS$395Manufacturer US product page, 2 Nov 2026US$349.99Manufacturer US page, 2 Nov 2026
Data originManufacturer product/help pages, FDA clearance and official device-identifier recordManufacturer product page and FDA summary K242796
BlueGreenYellowRedNear-infrared

LED count and output are not measures of effectiveness. Output figures use different, often unspecified measurement conditions. Prices keep their original currency and are not current offers.

Questions

Which has more wavelengths, the Omnilux Contour or the Shark CryoGlow?

The Shark CryoGlow lists 3 wavelengths and the Omnilux Contour lists 2. More wavelengths is not the same as more effective.

Do the Omnilux Contour and Shark CryoGlow share any wavelengths?

Yes: 830 nm.

Which research matches each mask?

6 of the 15 summarised studies match both. 0 match only the Omnilux Contour and 4 match only the Shark CryoGlow.

Omnilux Contour Face

Full specifications
Manufacturer source · Verification record

Manufacturer sources confirm 132 LEDs in 66 dual-chip bulbs, 633 and 830 nm light, flexible silicone and approximately 30 mW/cm² reported output. The official device-identifier record links Omnilux Contour FACE, model TN19G, to K191629. The reference price is US $395, checked 2 November 2026.

Manufacturer product/help pages, FDA clearance and official device-identifier record.

Shark CryoGlow FW312

Full specifications
Manufacturer source · Verification record

FDA summary K242796 lists 480 LEDs in 160 tri-wick packages and nominal 415, 630 and 830 nm light. Listed programmes last 6.4 minutes for Better Aging, 8.4 for Skin Clearing and 4.3 for Skin Sustain. Use the FW312 manual. Manufacturer US price checked 2 November 2026: $349.99.

Manufacturer product page and FDA summary K242796.